Calculator
Energy Audit ROI Estimator
Spend a few minutes here before you spend a few lakh on an audit. See realistic payback, NPV, IRR and 10-year cumulative savings — calibrated to Indian industry and commercial-building averages.
Inputs
Result
How this works
This tool models the cashflow of an energy audit plus its identified retrofits:
Upfront = Audit cost + Implementation cost
Year-N savings = Year-1 savings × (1 + tariff escalation)^(N-1)
NPV = -Upfront + Σ (Year-N savings / (1 + discount rate)^N)
IRR = discount rate at which NPV = 0
Simple payback ignores escalation and discounting. NPV and IRR are the right numbers when you are competing for capital against other projects. For anything over ₹50 lakh retrofit, always present the NPV and IRR.
Typical audit savings by facility type
First-audit savings ranges from BEE PAT data, industry benchmarks, and ASHRAE guidance. Second and third audits find less.
| Facility type | Typical savings | Biggest opportunity area |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing (discrete) | 10–15% | Motors, compressed air, HVAC |
| Process industry | 6–10% | Heat recovery, steam system |
| Hospital | 10–15% | HVAC, hot water, OT sterilisation |
| Hotel | 12–18% | HVAC, lighting, hot water |
| Commercial office | 15–22% | HVAC scheduling, lighting, plug loads |
| Data centre | 5–8% | PUE optimisation, cooling setpoints |
| Warehouse / logistics | 15–25% | LED conversion, HVAC zoning |
Worked example — pharma manufacturing
Large pharma plant, ₹12 crore annual electricity bill. Commissioning a Level 2 energy audit.
- Audit identifies 10% savings opportunity: ₹1.2 cr/year (Year 1)
- Audit cost: ₹5 lakh
- Implementation cost: ₹36 lakh (30% of identified savings)
- Total upfront: ₹41 lakh
- Simple payback: 4.1 months ✓
- 10-year NPV @ 10% discount, 5% tariff escalation: ₹8.7 crore
- IRR: approximately 295%
- Carbon saved: ~830 tonnes CO₂/year
The numbers sound unrealistic until you realise energy audits typically find savings the CFO has been paying for every month for years. The ROI is not about the audit finding new savings — it is about unlocking savings that were already possible.
Why most audits under-deliver (and how to fix it)
Audit reports promise 15% savings. Year-two invoices show 3%. What happens in between?
- No sub-metering = no way to verify the savings, so they cannot be defended when they backslide
- Operators revert to old setpoints the week after the auditor leaves
- The meter was temporary — pulled out after the 4-week audit window, so the facility is blind again
- No accountability loop — nobody is comparing actual to predicted consumption each month
Titan Audit is built to stay after the audit ends. Same Class 0.5S metering engine, split-core CTs that deploy in 2 minutes without downtime, and an app that generates branded PDF audit reports without a laptop. When the audit finishes, leave the meter installed and connect it to the Energy Intelligence Platform for continuous M&V. Same hardware, no second purchase, no swap-out. See the Energy Audit solution for the full workflow.
Our ESCO customers particularly benefit: the audit hardware becomes the M&V hardware becomes the performance-contract monitoring hardware. One device, three revenue events.
Frequently asked questions
Six questions on audit scope, BEE PAT compliance, and making savings stick.
Related products & solutions
The measurement stack that makes audit savings durable, not aspirational.
Titan Audit — Energy Logger
Split-core CT energy logger. Deploy in 2 min, no shutdown. PDF reports from phone. Stays after the audit.
Learn More →Energy Audit Solution
BEE PAT and ASHRAE Level 2/3 audits with audit-to-subscription M&V path.
Learn More →Energy Efficiency Solution
What happens after the audit — continuous monitoring to cut factory electricity 10–25%.
Learn More →Ready to audit — and keep the savings?
Talk to our team about BEE PAT, ASHRAE Level 2/3, or ESCO engagements.
